We all got to read the passionate and adorned with ruminations lexical D'Annunzio, the rich and endless descriptions of Eco, the heartbreaking emotions inlaid in the words of Dostoevsky ... All of us have read more words than are in our vocabulary, we have fluctuated in enriching verbal abstractions of an imaginary enclosed by metaphors and similes and we have to drink to the rich sources.
But only now, I'm starting to focus on the idea that we infelici Utenti, viviamo in una nuova era contrassegnata da quel arido
2
(web 2.0, anno 2000...) e tutto quello che poc'anzi vi ho detto dimenticatevelo nel deposito degli oggetti smarriti della vecchia stazione dei mezzi antiquati. 
La comunicazione 2.0 qualcuno
ha fatto un upgrade di release a quest'epoca. Ma chi è quel
qualcuno ? Siamo io
1
! Siamo noi Programmatori che animiamo una tecnologia impalpabile, invisibile, inodore e in-
PerTuttiGliAltriDeiCinqueSens
i.
Il software è the proponent of that 2.Software that we limit the number of words, software that encourage us to shorten, condense and impoverish the text, software that translate the Italian text in a "tiled", software that indexes the contents of crumbling texts in empty words, software that "guessing" software that captures the arrogance of reason ... is inevitable, the software is making us change communication. I had read somewhere that the writer (aka Writer ) should not bend the rules of the software (for the semantic web, condensation of keywords in titles, short link
&
long title , statistical analysis of the search words ...), but should continue to educate people in building a harmonious lexical, rather than impoverish the forms in favor of new technologies and arid (-> chewing well the text to make a bolus digestible by a stupid software).
As you can see, I never had the habit of shaping my lyrics to make them juicy, stuffed full of saliva and chewed the eyes of a pretentious
crawler, so I write as a mother made me
.
But perhaps my stubborn economic prose is unusual and only a pompous text that confuses people, from the research done in the web, seems to be clear.
How I came to this conclusion? I used a software! Yes, it looks ridiculous and it is, but I could really use a software to understand, moreover, are a programmer who made a hole a few lessons of Italian for "studying" the mysterious video game software to the sound of coins from $ 500. What
told me this software? Some your curiosity led you here. As you can see the image at the opening, someone / a had the wonderful ability to make a stout web search by dialing (rather than a search phrase like a sonnet spring) these words:
like making love in the butt
Leaving aside an analysis of four cents sull'ignaro / a
a user, the question that I have done is : How is it possible that this blog ranks first in one of the most important search engines? Before even "The FAQ: The session or an ** ** The"??
, and only then, I wondered: how can a person do such a search is tempted to click on the link of this blog to log my words, which reports descriptive as the sum produced by a collegiate Software:
More+: Il didietro di Debian - Programmatore per caso
22 giu 2010 ... Certamente sì. Il bello è che per ora non serve farlo esplicitamente: sta ... Per loro la bellezza estetica è una parte fondamentale del marketing, ... Una comunità volontaria come Debian fa marketing con modalità ...
Certo le frasi come “
Il bello è che per ora non serve farlo explicit "and" A community volunteer "could give points out to anything but ...Maybe in the eyes of unsuspecting Internet users that 3.0 that my article has given more satisfactory mysterious revelations of an ancient FAQ 2.0.
not tell me that we are already at the threshold of another new epochal change: the 3.0?
The age of 3.0
will be the era where people now addicted to the modus operandi imposed by the software, developed texts as (and worst) of the crawlers that have brought us the age of 2.0!
Finally, the analysis produces a + More Top conclude this post with an inevitable + More Top:
the best that led thirsty surfers in the circle of my readers
.
(I prefer not to classify and comment)
intimacy
Corgnati
you're a ** ses
or butt woman you want to put it behind
the hair of women with much more hair
- true images of the potatoes and you **
- of women you like making love in the butt women who do it behind
- my first time back to women's forum
- Sooner or later you will say to me: This mio blog, almeno, ha soddisfatto queste vostre inconfessabili curiosità? Vi devo spiegare qualcosa?
- Note:
1
No, non è un errore, è una sorta di, passatemi la definizione, “singolare maestatis”
2
